Archive for the ‘WOM Ethics’Category

Disclosure Matters. WOMMA Shows How.

WOMMA has been all over the social media marketing issues related to transparency and disclosure. We’ve held open discussions on the Living Ethics blog, hosted webinars, shared legal perspective, and delivered panel presentations at conferences. And now we have issued a GUIDE TO DISCLOSURE IN SOCIAL MEDIA.

BACKSTORY
The issue of ethical word of mouth marketing has taken on new prominence given the rise of social media websites like Twitter and Facebook. Many brands and agencies are designing word of mouth marketing programs to foster relationships with online influencers.

To foster these relationships, brands and agencies will sometimes give bloggers material compensation (loaner product, free services, in-kind gifts, and special access privileges) and/or actual compensation (cash) in exchange for talking online about a product/service a business provides. For such testimonials and endorsements, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is now requiring marketers and bloggers to be 100% transparent in disclosing any material relationship between the two.

DISCLOSURE MATTERS
At the most basic level, if there is a relationship between a blogger and a brand that might affect the credibility of an endorsement; such a connection must be adequately disclosed. This act of disclosure protects both consumers and advertisers because it assures consumers that testimonials are truthful and trustworthy, and it offers marketers a proven way to reach audiences with credible information. The matter of disclosure is vital because word of mouth works best when it is 100% credible.

While the WOMMA Ethics Code, updated most recently in September 2009, is compliant with everything the FTC is now requiring from marketers and bloggers, our member companies have asked for more specific guidance as it relates to adequately displaying disclosure online.

BEST PRACTICE GUIDANCE
WOMMA’S GUIDE TO DISCLOSURE IN SOCIAL MEDIA was written and vetted by a cadre of industry leaders, WOMMA members, non-members, academics, and social media participants. This guidebook details how and where to make online disclosure clear and prominent. It also outlines the responsibilities of marketers and bloggers to ensure adequate disclosure happens.

Key online platforms covered in this Disclosure Guide include: Blogs, Online Comments, Twitter, Social Networks, Video Sharing websites, Photo Sharing websites, and Podcasts.

*** DOWNLOAD GUIDEBOOK (.pdf) ***

disclosurecover2

17

02 2010

WOM-COMM Online Course

Perhaps you know someone at your company who needs to get up to speed on word of mouth and social media marketing. Perhaps that someone is you. WOMMA is here to help.

Beginning Jan. 5, WOMMA is offering WOM-COMM, a seven-week online course sharing best practice education on how to more effectively and ethically use online and offline word of mouth marketing. You’ll learn the core strategies and tactics benchmark businesses are using to get customers talking. And, you’ll gain the knowledge needed to best measure the success of your next WOM marketing program.

The faculty for WOM-COMM is top-notch with practitioners (not pundits). At the recent CREATING TALKABLE BRANDS Conference, the WOM-COMM faculty gave us a sneak preview of what to expect.

Interested?

Click to learn more about WOM-COMM.

Tags:

09

12 2009

Tyler LeCompte on the FTC Guidelines

We’re continuing to share perspectives from WOMMA members on how their companies are incorporating and interpreting the new FTC guidelines.

Tyler LeCompte is the director of operations at MeHype, a company that connects brands with amateur and professional video filmmakers who produce online marketing videos in support of a product or service. Tyler shares his take at three questions we’re asking WOMMA members to sound off on.

Q1: What concerns have your clients raised to you about the FTC requiring disclosure?

TYLER: “ Of the clients that have been paying attention to the recent FTC guidelines, most have expressed that they are happy to have some documented guidance from a leading source such as the FTC about required disclosure for any ‘sponsored’ blogging/review programs that they have either been participating in or have been considering for integration into their Word of Mouth Marketing efforts. Luckily, none require many changes to their current internal guidelines since they all subscribed to the WOMMA Ethics Code as previously defined prior to the FTC ruling which encouraged transparency and upfront disclosure for any questionable relationships.”

Q2: What steps is MeHype taking in designing marketing programs to comply with the disclosure requirement?

TYLER: “None of our existing clients have much internal changes to make to their existing programs, mainly simply integrating the newly required disclosure statements and defining more clearly their ‘sponsorship’ payments, be they either cash or otherwise. Going forward, we will be including a specific disclosure agreement contract that adheres to the FTC guidelines as well as the updated WOMMA Ethics Code.”

Q3: Have you seen a best practice example of disclosure? If so, do share who is doing what and why you see it as a best practice.

TYLER: “ I believe IZEA has been leading the charge as to proper disclosure, and will continue to be a leading force in the bloggersphere for proper disclosure of sponsored conversations (relevant to blogs versus reviews). Any of their member blogs all have the required disclosure statements built into their sites and required statements for each particular post easily available for each member to use. As with most Social Media tools, making the ability to integrate/share these tools and disclosures easy for the end user will improve the overall success and adoption of the FTC guidelines.”

More perspectives from WOMMA members on the FTC Guidelines to come …

12

11 2009

Blake Cahill on the FTC Guidelines

We’re continuing to share perspectives from WOMMA members on how their companies are incorporating and interpreting the new FTC guidelines.

Blake Cahill, vice-president of corporate marketing with Visible Technologies, steps up to plate and take his swings at three questions we’re asking WOMMA members to sound off on.

Q1: What concerns have your clients raised to you about the FTC requiring disclosure?

BLAKE: “We have a wide variety of clients that are investing in listening, learning and engaging with their customers in the social media channel and the most important attribute they share is being transparent when they engage. They really want their customers to know who they are.”

Q2: What is Visible Technologies doing to ensure compliance with the disclosure requirement?

BLAKE: “Well, we don’t execute marketing programs on behalf of our customers but our technologies require that brands or agency domains be used when responding using our technologies.

Q3: Have you seen a best practice example of disclosure? If so, do share who is doing what and why you see it as a best practice.

BLAKE: “From a best practice perspective, I am seeing domains and twitter handles being created that embed the brand name or department as part of the .com address or twitter handle. For example @comcastcares or @ask_wellsfargo. This way end customers can see and know that it belongs to the brand or department because it is also promoted or mentioned directly on a customer’s website or other forms of regular customer notification.”

More perspectives from WOMMA members on the FTC Guidelines to come …

06

11 2009

Steve Hershberger on the FTC Guidelines

We’re continuing to share perspectives from WOMMA members on how their companies are incorporating and interpreting the new FTC guidelines.

Today, we hear from Steve Hershberger, ComBlu principal and co-founder. ComBlu designs and manages influencer marketing programs and brand-related communities, so the new guidelines from the FTC play a role in how ComBlu does business. Steve smartly riffs on three questions posed to him.

Q1: What concerns have your clients raised to you about the FTC requiring disclosure?

STEVE: “The alarming thing is that this topic has not been socialized enough through the brand management corridors at big brands, let alone smaller marketers and even agencies, with only a few exceptions. Nine times out of ten, this is a topic we bring up with clients and prospects as part of a strategic planning initiative or at least include in a deep dive landscape review. I am not yet convinced that marketers realize the business implications, including risk, that is involved in social media, which is why the adoption and adherence of standards and accepted best practices is so crucial.

Today, we still see the approach to social media risk, in this case, defined as paid endorsement and advocate claims as ad-hoc. In essence, it is either an after-thought or treated as someone else’s problem. The problem is that most marketers, unlike their counterparts in regulated industries such as financial services and healthcare haven’t yet experienced close up, what a regulating governmental body with a mandate is capable of doing.

Marketers cannot simply expect to open up the doors of social engagement and not apply discipline to their efforts. If they do so, even in ignorance to the regulations, it is a matter of time before something bad happens. Applying a set of social marketing guidelines that comply with the FTC guidelines is frankly, pretty straightforward, it’s really a matter of approach and process. There is really no excuse for not doing it, especially as time goes on that this topic becomes more and more visible.

Typically, we try and make it easy for clients by baking it into the approach we design for them and then train them as to the what and why. Part of our role over time is to make spot checks to ensure the best practices and standards become part of the natural process and culture of the organization behind the brand. We are not, nor want to be ‘hall monitors’ but do understand that doing things right doesn’t take much more effort the first time than simply winging it (if you have the right resources and team), after that, innovation and social marketing activities should even get easier!

When or if we get pushback, we have a conversation similar to the one I’ve outlined above. If they are not willing to adhere to a set of best practices and standards, we simply won’t work with them. The risk is too great.”

Q2: What steps is ComBlu taking in designing marketing programs to comply with the disclosure requirement?

STEVE: “We have built our social marketing processes, both planning and execution around a set of living best practices. Because of this, any of the programs our brands are involved in have the tools and approaches necessary to comply baked right in.

In some cases, it’s as simple as a series of check boxes built into program tools and planning guides. In other cases, we had to create tools for brand teams to use, such as a rewards spectrum guide that provides a spectrum of sample rewards from explicit (‘Here’s a laptop you can have to use in testing if you blog about my product. Oh, don’t worry about returning it.’) to implicit (‘Thank you for your help. We want to spotlight your work on in our community.’).

As part of our work, we do regular planning sessions, as does everyone else in our field. We track these activities and meet on the results, along with the more traditional social marketing metrics. Again, it’s not that hard if you approach it right.

It is important to have a well-defined and accessible set of social media guidelines that is available to both your employees and your customers. You should be able to tie the content and activity your brand is doing directly online and offline.

Lastly, we would also suggest quarterly meetings to ‘audit’ social media activities. This can be done simply by creating a social media best practices checklist and requiring your marketing teams to review planning documents, processes, activities, and resources to align with the items on the checklist. Self policing is better than mandatory policing (think Sarbanes-Oxley).”

Q3: Have you seen a best practice example of disclosure? If so, do share who is doing what and why you see it as a best practice.

STEVE: “A number of big brands are starting to do it well. Intel, Dell and Best Buy are three that come to mind. I think the biggest reason that Intel and Dell are doing well at it has to do with one key decision they have made. Both have set up centralized, cross-functional teams that are Centers of Excellence. These teams own the responsibility to set up, train, develop and deliver best practices approaches that hold brand teams and marketers accountable for both FTC compliance, as well as, delivering meaningful, true programs that deliver real value.

The good news is this approach is transformative. Marketing is changing for the better, this is a driver of that. So the short term pain is well worth the long term gain.”

More perspectives from WOMMA members on the FTC Guidelines to come …

03

11 2009

WOMMA Members on the new FTC Guidelines

It was a few weeks ago when the Federal Trade Commission released its updated guidelines on endorsements and testimonials used in advertising. Word of mouth marketers are focusing on the impact these revised guidelines will have on social media marketing activities.

(There’s a half-day session on this topic at a upcoming word of mouth marketing conference you may have heard about.)

Over the next month we’ll be sharing perspectives from WOMMA members on how their companies are incorporating and interpreting the new FTC guidelines.

The issue in all of this for word of mouth marketers comes down simply to disclosure. If a brand/agency designs a program where a blogger receives in-kind gifts (free camera), special access privileges (trip to visit company’s HQ), and cash (moola, dinero, benjamins) as part of a marketing program designed to spark word-of-mouth, that material connection must be fully disclosed by the blogger.

This act of disclosure protects both consumers and marketers because it assures consumers that product testimonials are truthful and trustworthy, and it offers marketers a viable way to reach consumers with credible information.

Rod Brooks, chief marketing officer with PEMCO Insurance, is pleased to see the FTC stepping up to provide guidance:

In marketing there are shades of gray … but in terms of these new FTC regulations, it’s back and white. PEMCO strives for transparency in all of our business practices and across all mediums. We’re pleased these new industry guidelines support our longstanding belief that there’s no right way to do the wrong thing.

MeHype is deep into the user-generated marketing waters. The company links brands with amateur and professional video filmmakers who produce online marketing videos in support of a product or service. Tyler LeCompte is the director of operations at MeHype and he is also pleased with the recent FTC happenings:

“[Clients] have expressed that they are happy to have some documented guidance from a leading source such as the FTC about required disclosure for any ‘sponsored’ blogging/review programs that they have either been participating in or have been considering. Going forward, we will be including a specific disclosure agreement contract that adheres to the FTC guidelines as well as the updated WOMMA Ethics Code.

More perspectives from WOMMA members to come in future posts…

02

11 2009

Will the FTC come after me?

Some of the fallout from the updated FTC regulations concern how the FTC will monitor and track violators. Violators being people using social media to endorse a product or service without disclosing any material connection they have to the product/service they are touting.

Will the FTC come after individual bloggers for not disclosing they have been influenced with free product to post something about a product/service? That’s a question many bloggers have.

According to Anthony DiResta, WOMMA’s general counsel, the FTC will not be monitoring online activity all day every day to ensure compliance. That’s not how the FTC works.

In the WOMMA webinar from Oct. 8 discussing the new FTC guidelines, Anthony explained how the FTC will track and monitor compliance.

According to Anthony, the FTC will listen to complaints filed by consumer groups, trade associations, attorney general offices, the Better Business Bureau, and individual consumers about potential abuse of endorsements in social media channels. If a submitted complaint interests the FTC, an investigation may begin and some form of punishment may be handed out if violations are found.

So no … the FTC will not play the role of big brother and track every blogger’s every move. The FTC will, however, pay attention to suspicious activity if they receive credible complaints about potential abuse.

13

10 2009

WOMMA’s Archived FTC Webinar

Much has been written and much will continue to be written about the implications of the revised FTC guidelines on endorsements and testimonials in advertising. For WOMMA, we’ve been tracking these matters since the inception of WOMMA. Ethics in marketing has always mattered to WOMMA.

Our Ethics Code is 100% compliant with the new FTC regulations. In fact, the FTC cited WOMMA standards throughout their guidelines document (.pdf) so you can trust the information we’ve been sharing how to design word of mouth and social media marketing programs to be ethically sound.

On Thursday, October 8 WOMMA hosted a webinar discussing the updated regulations from the FTC on endorsements and testimonials used in advertising as it relates to social media marketing programs. Paul Rand, WOMMA’s president elect and CEO of the Zocalo Group discussed how these new regulations will impact marketers with WOMMA’s legal counsel Anthony DiResta from the Manatt Phelps & Phillips law firm.

You can view an archived unedited 60-minute version of the webinar on SlideShare. An edited version (10:30 minutes) can also be viewed.

During the second part of the webinar, Paul Rand asked Anthony DiResta to give a legal perspective to important questions concerning how businesses and bloggers should practically address these new FTC guidelines.

I’ve edited this Q&A discussion from the webinar into a short presentation. Click on the play button below to listen and learn. Questions asked and answered in this presentation include:

  • How will the FTC track and monitor compliance to the new regulations?
  • Will existing online marketing programs be exempt from these new regulations?
  • Should marketers attempt to fix old blogger outreach programs?
  • Does the FTC see a difference in sending an ‘influencer’ free product versus paying someone to blog about a product
  • 11

    10 2009

    Practical Advice (FTC Stuff)

    Given the revised FTC Guidelines requiring disclosure, Ian Paul from PCWorld shares practical advice for how we can credibly participate in online social media.

    “If you receive gifts, money or any other type of compensation from a product manufacturer or service provider you have to disclose it.”

    “If you are going to tweet about how awesome your employer is, make sure everybody knows you work there.”

    READ MORE from Ian Paul.

    07

    10 2009

    Developing story … new FTC Guidelines are Published

    ftc_new

    WOMMA will continue to be all over the just-announced new guidelines from the FTC on endorsements and testimonials. We’ll be giving members and non-members practical guidance on what the revised guidelines mean and how to ensure marketers can develop/implement word of mouth marketing programs to completely abide by the FTC guidelines.

    The press release from the FTC toplines the revisions made to the guidelines. Important snippets marketers must be aware of include:

    “… the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service.”

    “… the revised Guides … clearly state that both advertisers and endorsers may be liable for false or unsubstantiated claims made in an endorsement – or for failure to disclose material connections between the advertiser and endorsers.”

    “The revised Guides also make it clear that celebrities have a duty to disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media.”

    If you have been following the discussions WOMMA has had and the advice WOMMA has given, the issue of clear disclosure isn’t new. WOMMA addressed the disclosure issue in a recent webinar. (Archived versions here: short version (11-min) ; full-version (60-min).)

    The bottom line is when there is a material connection between a blogger and a brand that might affect the credibility of the endorsement, such a connection must be fully disclosed. This protects both consumers and advertisers because it assures consumers that product testimonials are truthful and trustworthy, and it offers marketers and advertisers a viable way to reach consumers with credible information.

    Expect more guidance from WOMMA this week and throughout the coming weeks and months about how the revised FTC guidelines will impact your word of mouth and social media marketing programs.

    05

    10 2009