Archive for the ‘WOM Strategies’Category

A Look Inside “The Listening Playbook”

According to Advertising Research Foundation (ARF) president Bob Barocci, “The single biggest opportunity in the history of consumer marketing lays dormant.”

The opportunity Bob speaks of is LISTENING.

If listening is the single biggest opportunity in the history of consumer marketing, then why is it such an untapped resource? Why aren’t more brands engaging with customers through listening-inspired marketing activities?

Those questions and more are answered and explored in THE LISTENING PLAYBOOK written by Steve Rappaport, ARF’s Knowledge Solutions Director.

This worthwhile book presents listening-inspired marketing to help brands solve marketing challenges ranging from maintaining sales momentum to co-creating new products to understanding shifts in the marketplace to so much more. 30 case study examples are detailed showing how brands are applying listening-inspired marketing to impact their business.

Also detailed are do-it-yourself and full-service vendor methods of listening to the online and offline conversations customers are having about brands.

It really is more than a book to read, it’s a book to use… hence it’s called a “playbook.”

The first step in this playbook on applying listening-inspired marketing is to… LISTEN. Easier said than done as The Listening Playbook points out. Some brands aren’t open to listening for fear of what they may hear. Other brands are overwhelmed by the voluminous amounts of conversation data found online. Many brands are unsure how best to positively impact financials through listening. And, some brands want to listen but don’t know how.

To assist brands in their listening approach, The Listening Playbook explains the various do-it-yourself search/monitoring tools, text analytics software services, and full-service listening platform vendors.

That’s helpful information but the most valuable information in the playbook are the case study examples of how brands are applying listening-inspired marketing activities.

For example, we learn how MINI USA analyzed online conversations and discovered MINI owners “… viewed their car as a blank canvas onto which they could project their personality, through customizations and modding [slang for ‘modifying’], and enjoy doing it and sharing it virtually and in-person. With that listening insight, MINI USA developed various activities to foster more sharing opportunities within the MINI community of customers.

We also learn exactly how CDW, a computer hardware and accessories brand, listened to conversations its customers were having on three company-driven online communities. Based upon what CDW heard from its customers, the company overhauled its cold call marketing strategies and designed new customer relationship strategies.

JetBlue’s listening strategies, along with scores of other companies, are detailed in The Listening Playbook showing how the airline uses Twitter to stay ahead of potential customer service issues and react to any customer service issue flare-ups happening 24/7.

As I mentioned, The Listening Playbook is a very helpful and valuable resource from any company wanting to improve its business from listening to the conversations customers are having and will continue to have about their company.

A printed copy can be purchased online at Amazon and Lulu.

A bite-size chunk can be had for free by reading (or downloading) Chapter 1 off Scribd.com.

The ARF Listening Playbook - Chapter 1, Essentials of Listening

DISCLOSURE: I paid for my copy of THE LISTENING PLAYBOOK. WOMMA is friends with ARF. A session at the upcoming School of WOM conference will be co-presented by WOMMA and ARF. I liked ALF. Liked that ALF was featured on a recent episode of CBS’s “The Big Bang Theory.” I also like the smell of mayo in the morning.

11

03 2010

The Influence Factor | Q&A with Idil Cakim (GolinHarris)

Influentials are among us. They are known as thought-leaders, trendsetters, mavens, sneezers, etc. Influentials can help spark word-of-mouth conversations leading to a tipping point of sales success. However, It’s not easy for marketers to identify influentials and measure the impact of their influence.

In WOMMA’s Measurement & Metrics Guidebook, Idil Cakim, VP of Interactive Media at GolinHarris, shares her views on “The Influence Factor” and how brands can engage, monitor, and measure influencer marketing programs.

This short Q&A will give you a bite-size chunk of Idil’s perspective on designing and delivering influencer marketing programs.

1. What constitutes influence offline and online?
“The fundamentals of offline and online influence are the same: perceived knowledge of the influencer, credibility and hence trust. In the offline world, we have more access to visual, cultural and social clues that help us assess the influence factor. Meanwhile online, we have more third-party resources and published statements that can help us assess a given source’s influence and authority. Whether online or offline, influencers are experts who know how to spread their messages either through peer-to-peer conversations, organized activities or publications.”

2. Any pitfalls to Influencer Marketing?
“The most common pitfall is sharing an idea or a product with too few influencers and expecting to move the needle. An influencer is bound to take the message further than the average person. However brands may need to engage hundreds of influencers at a time to have quantitative results that show the impact of their efforts.

Another point for consideration is that not all influencers are equal. Brands and organizations first need to determine what constitutes influence in their respective fields and research thoroughly when identifying their own set of influencers.

Lastly, thinking in terms of campaigns with limited times for outreach undercuts the value brands/organizations can derive from influencer relations. Spot outreach is fine, but there needs to be ongoing communication between the brand and its influencers, just like any healthy relationship.”

3. What are three steps a brand should take to design a better influencer marketing program?
First, determine your own influencer criteria and make sure you can recruit enough influencers who can create noticeable change.

Second, as you design your program, think of your communication goals and clarify what will determine success. Is it only increase in awareness or change in some type of behavior? Make sure that your program is designed to reach these goals.

Third, plan for ongoing engagement. Sustain authentic communications and continuously offer value to your influencers through news, information, first-to-try types of offers.”

**********
BONUS COVERAGE:
On a recent WOMMA Brands Council Jam Session, Idil shared more practical insights about Influencer Marketing. The following SlideShare presentation includes snippets from this recent webinar.

01

03 2010

Sentiment Analysis | Q&A with Margaret Francis (Scout Labs)

It’s one thing for a brand to get customers talking with word of mouth marketing. It’s another thing for a brand to understand the tone and attitudinal undertones of the conversations people are having about the brand.

As VP of Product at Scout Labs, Margaret Francis is responsible for designing online listening tools to help brands better understand consumer sentiment in online word of mouth conversations.

For the WOMMA Measurement & Metrics Guidebook, Margaret contributed an article about “mining social media for consumer opinion” to develop “business intelligence” and “measure marketing impact.” This article is a deep dive into the budding field of Sentiment Analysis.

I asked Margaret a few questions to help us better understand her perspective on harvesting, analyzing, and measuring consumer sentiment about brands.

Explain the importance for why a brand should do Sentiment Analysis.
Margaret Francis (MF): “A brand like Nike needs to know if people like them or not, but on the whole they probably know that many people associate them with favorable qualities that support their brand promise. I’m sure they have a brand tracker that measures overall Nike brand perception in much the same way as geologists study glaciers, looking for long term evidence of movement. Traditional sentiment analysis falls into this genre of study. It’s interesting data, but not for every day, and mainly intended for the very few people at Nike that have custody of ‘the brand.’

What Nike doesn’t have nearly as good sentiment analysis data about is consumer opinion about the specific products, sub brands, campaigns, and verticals that the marketing organization works on day-to-day. For instance, the people in Basketball might have makes, models, athletes, and campaigns whose social media presence they need to be tracking. This is the information that marketers need to make practical decisions- what video to feature on the splash page, which campaign to spend more money on, via what channel, which shoe to ask an athlete to wear at an appearance. Quickly and affordably getting below the mega-brand level- from ‘Nike’ to ‘LeBron IV’- is a big leap forward.

Also, it isn’t just brands that need sentiment analysis. How do consumers feel about use of sustainable materials, Chinese knock-offs, personalization, marathons, Spandex, the color pink, or a sponsored athlete’s extramarital affairs? These are not strictly “brand” inquiries but they are very important questions for marketing and other functional areas that deal with consumer preferences- areas like product development and customer service.”

What are some absolute “No No’s” businesses must consider when creating and using a Sentiment Analysis measurement process?
(MF): “There are known problems with having humans decide what is and is not positive/ negative sentiment:

Consistency: Humans don’t agree with each other more than about 85% of the time. The same person might, in different sessions, rate the same document a different way depending on interpretation. Is ‘Merrill Lynch rated Google a hold’ good, because Google used to be a ’sell,’ or bad, because it used to be a ‘buy’? Is ‘hold’ always bad? Or is this even an opinion? Many would call it neutral because the author is not expressing an opinion. Humans try to overcome this with custom guidelines.

Interpretation: The humans involved don’t always know what they need to know to make a good call on sentiment. Is ‘I love my iPhone, I unlocked it this weekend’ good for Apple? Or bad, because people ought not to unlock their iPhones? Humans try to overcome this with educated resources familiar with brand strategy.

Cost: It is very expensive to have a person, or better yet 3-10 people, read the same document/ watch the same video/ track the same tweet, and apply a rating to it. Humans try to overcome this by finding cheaper humans.

Problem is, humans don’t scale in speed or expense. We need machine analysis of sentiment not because it is better than humans but because with the advent of social media, the pace and volume of the data far outstrips the human resources available to analyze it.

So the absolute no-no in creating a sentiment analysis program is thinking that a machine is going to be better than people. Faster and cheaper, sure. Better, probably not. Sentiment data that is produced using machine analysis should be used for all the same reasons, and with all the same caveats, that human scored sentiment data is.

That said, there’s a reason traditional PR firms have stuck to the same methodology for a long time: They do sentiment analysis only on blue chip media pieces, using only in-house resources with strict guidelines, so analysis is limited in scope and expense and absolutely defensible. This is understandable but hardly forward looking. The rich nuggets of market intelligence derived from social media are a source of competitive advantage that no one can afford to ignore.”

Talk about a specific brand that has benefitted from doing Sentiment Analysis.
(MF): “It’s hard for me to give you some of the more compelling examples I know of, because the brands concerned view those examples as confidential business intelligence. Let me give you a hypothetical example. It isn’t a mystery that there is a furor right now over the Toyota brand due to the ongoing recalls on multiple makes and models. Any user of Scout Labs could plug in a search for the brand “Toyota” and see that there’s been a shift from positive to negative opinion over the past 6 months, and read consumer comments about the reasons why. Notice the shift from overall positive to overall negative sentiment for Toyota:
toyota_scoutlabs2

But only Toyota knows what their strategic response has been. Perhaps they pulled all marketing spend on affected models and redirected it to products that have been in market for ages and have a great safety record. Has anyone else been seeing a lot of Toyota Sienna commercials lately? Perhaps they shifted attention to non-Toyota branded products, like Lexus. More importantly, what should Toyota do in the longer term to rebuild consumer confidence? What do consumers think? Some recent online sentiment include:

“…The crashworthiness of Toyota vehicles is still superior to many other manufacturers.”

“And as soon as the clouds pass, Toyota should talk about the amazing deals that they have.”

“Toyota should however complement the effort with a theme campaign that simply states that Toyota loves you.”

Platforms like Scout Labs exist to inform brand strategists, not replace them. In the hands of the right decision makers, the kind of real time sentiment analysis Scout Labs can provide on any word, brand, product or phenomenon is very powerful marketing intelligence.”

*** Learn more about WOMMA’s MEASUREMENT & METRICS GUIDEBOOK ***

25

02 2010

Advocacy Measurement | Q&A with David Rabjohns (MotiveQuest)

David Rabjohns has spent a career digging deep into discovering why consumers have developed passion around brands. Today, as the ceo of MotiveQuest, he helps companies understand the online passion conversation consumers are having about brands they love (and hate).

For the WOMMA Measurement & Metrics Guidebook, David shares insights into how to measure consumer advocacy. It’s a smart read and WOMMA members can download a (.pdf) copy of this guide. (A bound copy is also available.)

To learn more about David’s angle into consumer advocacy, I asked him a few questions… his responses are below.

What constitutes “advocacy” as it relates to marketing?
“When a conversation about a brand results in a personal recommendation for the brand, advocacy happens. Our research and client experience clearly shows a direct correlation exists between advocacy and sales. Greater advocacy leads to more personal recommendations that result in higher sales. At MotiveQuest, we’ve been able to track 72% of sales of a major liquor brand back to advocacy. In other words, marketing can spark conversations but advocacy can deliver sales.”

When measuring advocacy, what’s the most important consideration?
“It’s important to first distinguish between ‘participants’ and ‘advocates.’ Participants will talk about a brand while advocates will go a step or two further and recommend a brand. With that explained, the most important consideration when measuring advocacy is tracking the total number of advocates for a brand. Successful brands clearly have more advocates tomorrow than they did yesterday.”

Recently, the Edelman Trust Barometer revealed a significant decline in people believing their friends are a credible source of information… what’s your take on Edelman’s findings?
“Marketing people are abusing social media and thus reducing trust. Too many marketers are measuring social media success by the number of friends, fans, and followers a brand has. The term “friend” no longer has the same personal meaning it once did. Influencer marketing strategies have helped to also erode trust. Trust amongst friends and consumers depends on people having real, organic, honest conversations with each other on the web and in person.”

*** Learn more about WOMMA’s MEASUREMENT & METRICS GUIDEBOOK ***

24

02 2010

Cost Deflection | Q&A with Jennifer Voisard (ComBlu)

WOMMA recently published a MEASUREMENT & METRICS GUIDEBOOK sharing practical insights into quantifying offline and online word of mouth. WOMMA Members have access to a free download of the paper. A bound version of the Guidebook is available for everyone.

Over the next two weeks we’ll be publishing short Q&As with some of the marketers, researchers, and academics who have authored papers in the Guidebook.

We’re talking first with Jennifer Voisard, Community Manager and Analyst with ComBlu, about her piece on Cost Deflection. Voisard’s paper explains the financial benefits to how and why businesses can use social media engagement with customers and customer communities to reduce business expenses.

Your paper shares insights on applying the “Cost Deflection” model to online and offline WOM. Why is this of importance to a marketer?
“It is no secret that Marketers are on the hook to prove what we instinctively know to be true, that WOM produces substantial ROI. This was the catalyst for creating this Guidebook. The reason I focused on Cost Deflection was to offer Marketers a different way to approach this daunting task.

The thinking needs to go beyond increasing web traffic, coupon redemption rates, producing a funny viral video, hosting a successful house party or having a large fan base on Facebook. These are important indicators, but they don’t give you program ROI. Marketing can add real value by designing and integrating their engagement strategies based on the actual KPI’s of the business. No matter the economic climate, Cost Deflection always helps the bottom line and can make for a happy and receptive CEO come budget time.” (Jennifer Voisard)

What’s a key step businesses must do to incorporate a marketing-focused Cost Deflection model?
“Everyone has heard the phrase it takes a village. Well, it applies here to. The biggest key to success is the ability to break down organizational silos. Form an integrated team across multiple business units such as: Marketing, Customer Service, Engineering and Product Development for example.

In order for cross-functional collaboration to occur in an efficient manner, you’ll likely need buy-in at the executive level. Otherwise you may find yourself herding cats, and you run the risk of disappointing your customers by failing to effectively manage their feedback and most importantly their expectations.” (Jennifer Voisard)

In your opinion, what company has found success implementing a marketing-focused Cost Deflection model?
“I would say that there are some divisions in Microsoft that get this. The example I highlighted in the chapter was of an early pilot program within the Online Services group. Since then, they have formally implemented their new operational model. Today, their KPI’s speak for themselves, and we are starting to see program adoption increase.

WOM programs deepen the relationship between customer and brand. I think any company that embraces customer feedback and leverages the passion and expertise of their brand advocates, can have a successful program like this.” (Jennifer Voisard)

*** Learn more about WOMMA’s MEASUREMENT & METRICS GUIDEBOOK ***

22

02 2010

Disclosure Matters. WOMMA Shows How.

WOMMA has been all over the social media marketing issues related to transparency and disclosure. We’ve held open discussions on the Living Ethics blog, hosted webinars, shared legal perspective, and delivered panel presentations at conferences. And now we have issued a GUIDE TO DISCLOSURE IN SOCIAL MEDIA.

BACKSTORY
The issue of ethical word of mouth marketing has taken on new prominence given the rise of social media websites like Twitter and Facebook. Many brands and agencies are designing word of mouth marketing programs to foster relationships with online influencers.

To foster these relationships, brands and agencies will sometimes give bloggers material compensation (loaner product, free services, in-kind gifts, and special access privileges) and/or actual compensation (cash) in exchange for talking online about a product/service a business provides. For such testimonials and endorsements, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is now requiring marketers and bloggers to be 100% transparent in disclosing any material relationship between the two.

DISCLOSURE MATTERS
At the most basic level, if there is a relationship between a blogger and a brand that might affect the credibility of an endorsement; such a connection must be adequately disclosed. This act of disclosure protects both consumers and advertisers because it assures consumers that testimonials are truthful and trustworthy, and it offers marketers a proven way to reach audiences with credible information. The matter of disclosure is vital because word of mouth works best when it is 100% credible.

While the WOMMA Ethics Code, updated most recently in September 2009, is compliant with everything the FTC is now requiring from marketers and bloggers, our member companies have asked for more specific guidance as it relates to adequately displaying disclosure online.

BEST PRACTICE GUIDANCE
WOMMA’S GUIDE TO DISCLOSURE IN SOCIAL MEDIA was written and vetted by a cadre of industry leaders, WOMMA members, non-members, academics, and social media participants. This guidebook details how and where to make online disclosure clear and prominent. It also outlines the responsibilities of marketers and bloggers to ensure adequate disclosure happens.

Key online platforms covered in this Disclosure Guide include: Blogs, Online Comments, Twitter, Social Networks, Video Sharing websites, Photo Sharing websites, and Podcasts.

*** DOWNLOAD GUIDEBOOK (.pdf) ***

disclosurecover2

17

02 2010

Two Tweets and a Blog Post

More and more brands are using social media tools as a customer service opportunity. The ability to proactively react, rescue, and resolve issues using website like Twitter is truly transformative. Brands, whether they like it or not, are on call 24/7 in today’s online social world.

At a gathering recently in Washington DC, I shared a presentation on how (and why) brands are using social media to deliver customer service. (You can review the presentation slides here.)

As I was putting together my presentation, I noticed two tweets and a blog post that tell the importance of using social media to address issues from customers.

SMART INSIGHT (from @jowyang)
jowyang

MISSED OPPORTUNITY (from @jackiehuba)
jackiehuba

MADE OPPORTUNITY (from Robbin Phillips)
robbin1

04

02 2010

Advertising That Sparks Conversations

MINI COOPER gets it. They know how to use advertising to spark conversations. In Amsterdam, MINI’s ad agency created an outdoor campaign that managed to break through the holiday advertising clutter.

mini_cooper

This is old school offline WOM that spreads online as well. You may have already seen this passed around over email or twitter. On the MarketingProf’s DailyFix blog, Paul Williams breaks down the marketing strategy behind creating advertising that is worthy of WOM by being:

  • Attention-Getting
  • Having a Clear, Memorable Message
  • Brand Appropriate
  • Locally Relevant
  • Totally Remarkable
  • .

    Read Paul’s excellent breakdown of MINI’s WOM-worthy advertising.

    08

    01 2010

    Four Big Ideas Influencing Marketing in 2010

    As 2009 turns to 2010, it’s fitting to think about new ideas for the New Year. My latest article for PROMO magazine shares four big ideas overheard at WOMMA’s recent “Creating Talkable Brands” conference that brands and agencies would be smart to think about in 2010.

    Here’s a snippet…

    Clear is the New Clever
    It used to be that cheeky advertising was the dominant driver of brand messaging. Not today, according to Rob BonDurant, marketing vice president at Patagonia. In his keynote address, BonDurant talked about how his Patagonia marketing team follows the credo of “clear is the new clever.” He believes brands need to be more transparent in how they do business.

    Patagonia is serious about being an environmentally sustainable business; they are also serious about visually showing their commitment to the environment. Their clever Footprint Chronicles website allows consumers to track the social and environmental impact of a Patagonia product through all phases of production from design to manufacturing to delivery.

    Patagonia displays its clever transparency in other ways. For example, its digital catalogs are created using photos submitted by customers. (Last year, the company received 100,000 unsolicited photos from its customers.)

    To create sustainable word of mouth conversations, BonDurant recommends businesses practice storytelling more than marketing, “At Patagonia, we don’t sell. We tell stories because storytelling creates a tribe of believers, which is more valuable than ‘customers.’ ”

    >>> READ MORE from PROMO Magazine

    04

    01 2010

    WOM-COMM Online Course

    Perhaps you know someone at your company who needs to get up to speed on word of mouth and social media marketing. Perhaps that someone is you. WOMMA is here to help.

    Beginning Jan. 5, WOMMA is offering WOM-COMM, a seven-week online course sharing best practice education on how to more effectively and ethically use online and offline word of mouth marketing. You’ll learn the core strategies and tactics benchmark businesses are using to get customers talking. And, you’ll gain the knowledge needed to best measure the success of your next WOM marketing program.

    The faculty for WOM-COMM is top-notch with practitioners (not pundits). At the recent CREATING TALKABLE BRANDS Conference, the WOM-COMM faculty gave us a sneak preview of what to expect.

    Interested?

    Click to learn more about WOM-COMM.

    Tags:

    09

    12 2009